Student grant proposals and letters of recommendation are evaluated carefully by UAR academic staff. Submitting an application authorizes UAR staff to examine your transcripts and consult appropriate faculty and staff outside the UAR office regarding your project and qualifications. The review process is quite competitive due to high levels of student interest and limited availability of funds. Not all good proposals will receive grants.
Criteria for Funding
Criteria for funding proposals include the following:
- Originality and Significance. Research and creative work are efforts to explore new understandings of the world. Successful proposals tackle interesting new ideas and eventually contribute novel data, interpretations, insights and / or analyses to your chosen discipline.
- Intellectual Rigor. Successful proposals demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of what the broader research or artistic community already knows about your topic (as reflected in peer-reviewed publications, for example).
- Methods and techniques. Your methods and techniques address the questions or goals that you articulate in a direct and logical way. These methods stand up to informed criticism by other practitioners of your discipline. For Major Grant proposals, your participation in an honors program is an important part of demonstrating such rigor.
- Feasibility. A successful proposal outlines a realistic plan which stands a good chance of meeting with success. You discuss logistical preparations to date, identify potential hurdles and present contingency plans. These preparations help you surmount the unexpected obstacles that are inevitable when your thoughtful project design encounters the real world.
- Preparation. Successful applicants have undertaken the training and careful thought that promotes a successful experience. You have acquired a background in the methods that you propose to use and lined up an appropriate level of mentoring support. If you are conducting a project off-campus, or conducting research on human subjects, you will have completed the mandatory UAR special requirements.
UAR makes every effort to judge proposals in a timely way. Our goal is to announce decisions within three weeks of proposal submission deadlines for Small Grants and Conference Grants. UAR plans to announce decisions within seven weeks of the deadlines for Major Grants and Chappell Lougee Scholarships.
Proposals may be approved, denied or placed on hold. You may revise and resubmit a proposal that is placed on hold, but we cannot guarantee a decision date for such proposals.
- See Following Up on a Proposal to learn how to respond to your proposal decision.
After the review process is complete, proposals are subject to further policies and administrative steps before you receive funds. Your approved proposal may go unfunded if you fail to take these further steps. Check these policies, including what to do when a proposal is rejected or put on hold.
- Visit the For Awardees page for more details.